I will begin by saying; you probably do NOT want to read Fifty Shades of Grey if:
1. You are under the age of 18.
2. Your reading habits tend to lean to the extreme conservative end of the spectrum.
3. You abhor S&M/BDSM.
4. You have been abused or assaulted.
5. You are close to someone who has been abused or assaulted.
Now, I will share with you the plethora of reasons for which I loath Fifty Shades of Grey.
First, it is about ninety percent BDSM, which is absolutely not my taste. Aside from the problem I have with BDSM in general, I have more specific problems with what goes on in this book. Anastasia has never experienced this lifestyle before and is not even quite terrified or repulsed by the idea of it, merely diffident. Once she is a “willing” participant, Christian tells her she likes it, so she does. I find it hard to believe that it would be that simple.
Second, the characters have no depth. Christian is a man with a secret and horrible past, which he cannot seem to overcome. That’s about all we get. Anastasia is a student graduating from college who has never loved anyone, until now, and was an independent woman, until now. I have been reading nothing but books about sardonic teenage girls lately and I’ve managed to break away from that into ineffectual young women. Is that an upgrade or a downgrade? It really sends a horrible message to young women: Be yourself, until you meet a man who wants to beat you but is so good looking that you can forgive him for it; when that happens, you should be whomever or whatever he wants you to be. Really? And, while the author has some lines about Christian learning to compromise, make no mistake, it is Anastasia who does all the compromising. The only compromising Christian does is by adding one thing at a time instead of immersing her in “his world” all at once.
I also take issue with the writing. The story is set in Washington, USA and the characters, we are to assume, are American. The author is British. If you didn’t know this about the author, it would be evident by the very British colloquial phrases that the American characters use. That kind of thing flat out irritates me. It’s like watching a movie containing actors whose accents come and go. There were a couple of sentences that I seem to remember from Twilight. I can only guess James changed a word here or there because it smacks of plagiarism. Also, if one cannot describe a character as being intense without using the word intense half a dozen times in the same chapter, one should not be trying to describe an intense character. It’s a bit ironic, because later in the book, it seems as though James used her thesaurus function to purposely make her words dissimilar. If there’s one thing I can’t stand, it’s inconsistency, and, from the writing to the plot, this book is full of it.
Speaking of plot… Girl interviews man, man stalks girl, man declares he is dangerous and can’t give girl what she wants, girl falls in love with man and tries to devise a way to get what she wants, man proves what he said is true, girl is heartbroken. The End.
Sounds like a story we all want to read, doesn’t it? E. L. James herself says she’s *“not a great writer” and I couldn’t agree more. This was probably the most traumatic reading experience I’ve ever had and I definitely will not be reading the rest of the trilogy.
*See video of interview.